On Tue, 08 Aug 2000 08:49:07 -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote:
>In the meantime, is there a reason the suggestion of:
>
>> foo($x := 10, $y := 20)
>
>was dropped? It seems pretty obvious to me.
It only looks obvious to you, because it's familiar from other
programming languages. But Perl's equivalent to that is a bare "=", and
that is not quite acceptable because it will work immediately, and on
the wrong variable.
--
Bart.
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Andy Wardley
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Andy Wardley
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and paramet... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and parameters H.Merijn Brand
