> How about contain() or detach() or revalue()? I might just throw out that the operator "let" does the job in Lisp. > Also, how about renaming my() to local()? Will this be too confusing? I feel strongly that "my" and "our" should both be renamed, as well as "local". -- John Porter
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made default (... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made defau... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made default (... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made defau... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made ... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC: lexical variables m... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: lexical variables m... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made default (revi... J. David Blackstone
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made default (revi... Nick Ing-Simmons
- RE: RFC: lexical variables made default Ala Qumsieh
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made default John Porter
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made default Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made default John Porter
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made defau... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made ... John Porter
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made defau... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made ... John Porter
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made defau... skud
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made ... John Porter
- Re: RFC: lexical variables m... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: lexical variables m... John Porter