Re: RFC: Reimplement Warnings and Tainting as Pragmas

[Tom Christiansen]

>Wanted to get this out as an idea that could encompass lots of the
>concerns I'm seeing about warnings and such:

>=head1 TITLE

>Warnings and Tainting should be reimplemented as pragmas.

What part of warnings(3) and perllexwarn(1) are you in disagreement with?

--tom