Thus it was written in the epistle of Tom Christiansen,
>
> >Could you please write up an RFC on this?
>
> When in the process are we supposed to argue against this?
After the RFC is written, I believe. By analogy to typical committee action
(yes, I expect that we've all got a good quote re: committees, but if we
didn't have committees, lawyers and the government, we'd have to go back to
bashing other languages ;-), RFCs appear to be the motion & second, allowing
discussion and mailing lists appear to be the committees and subcommittees.
Ted "I put in my time as a parlimentarian" Ashton
P.S. There's also usually some discussion before the motion (we've had that)
and after a bit the chair (K.) says, "could someone word that as a motion?"
So far I think Robert would be comfortable :-).
Skud, keep up the good work :-).
--
Ted Ashton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), Info Sys, Southern Adventist University
==========================================================
"You couldn't have it if you did want it," the Queen said. "The rule is jam
tomorrow and jam yesterday but never jam to-day."
"It must come sometimes to "jam to-day,""Alice objected.
"No it can't," said the Queen. "It's jam every other day; to-day isn't any
other day, you know."
-- Carroll, Lewis
==========================================================
Deep thoughts to be found at http://www.southern.edu/~ashted
