>Actually, open() currently CAN have just one parameter. What it does, is >use a filehandle and a scalar variable with the same name, so >Nope. Get rid of it! (p.s. Has anybody ever actually used this feature, Yes, of course. That isn't an argument for its persistence, however. --tom
- RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to return handles Nathan Wiger
- Re: Don't reply! RFC: Modify open() and opendir()... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to return ha... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to retur... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to retur... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to return ha... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to retur... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to r... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() ... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opend... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and o... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC: Modify open() a... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Modify open() a... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC: Modify open() a... Tim Jenness