Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Theoretically, we'd like to make subs run as fast as ops. I'd say that the distinction between subs and ops should be dropped completely. Ops can be used as subs, subs as ops. The only distinction in the way either is used. We may need a better way to define function prototypes, though. -- Johan
- RFC: Higher resolution time values Gisle Aas
- Re: RFC: Higher resolution time values Sam Tregar
- Re: RFC: Higher resolution time values Graham Barr
- Re: RFC: Higher resolution time values Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC: Higher resolution time values Larry Wall
- Re: Ops versus subs (Was: Re: RFC: Highe... Johan Vromans
- Re: Ops versus subs (Was: Re: RFC: ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Ops versus subs (Was: Re: R... Johan Vromans
- Re: Ops versus subs (Was: R... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC: Higher resolution time values Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC: Higher resolution time values Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC: Higher resolution time values Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC: Higher resolution time values Gisle Aas
- Re: RFC: Higher resolution time values Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC: Higher resolution time val... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC: Higher resolution time... Nick Ing-Simmons