Tad pointed out: > Due to the recent "rename local()" and "can't return an array" > discussions here, we should also consider "rename wantarray()" > as well. > > It should be named wantlist(), because it does not tell you > if it wants an array, it tells you whether you were called in > list context or not. It should just be want() because I intend it to do *much* more :-) > I will RFCify this within the next few days (unless someone > can shoot it down right now). http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~damian/Perl/want.proposal Send me any suggestions (out-of-band). Damian
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... Simon Cozens
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... Tom Christiansen
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 req... Simon Cozens
- wantarray() should be named wantlist() (was R... Tad McClellan
- Re: wantarray() should be named wantlist(... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: wantarray() should be named wantl... Clayton Scott
- Re: wantarray() should be named ... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: wantarray() should be na... Nathan Wiger
- Re: wantarray() should be na... skud
- Re: wantarray() should be named wantlist(... Graham Barr
- Re: wantarray() should be named wantlist() (w... Damian Conway
- Re: wantarray() should be named wantlist(... Tad McClellan
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, o... Tom Christiansen
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... Matt Sergeant
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, on boo... Damian Conway