> Damian Conway wrote: > > http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~damian/TPC/2000/switch/paper.txt > > Curried operators might be a nice way of generalizing the switch > syntax. When we write: I'm just about to post an RFC proposing exactly that (albeit with a quite different syntax). Damian
- switch/case (c) vs. case (pascal) Stefan Moch
- Re: switch/case (c) vs. case (pascal) Tom Hughes
- Re: switch/case (c) vs. case (pascal) Tom Christiansen
- Re: switch/case (c) vs. case (pascal) Tom Hughes
- Re: switch/case (c) vs. case (pascal) Damian Conway
- Re: switch/case (c) vs. case (pascal) Tom Hughes
- Re: switch/case (c) vs. case (pascal) Ken Fox
- RE: switch/case (c) vs. case (pascal) Damian Conway
- RE: switch/case (c) vs. case (pascal) Ala Qumsieh