> > This RFC proposes that the right operand of a C<..> operator > > may be omitted in a list context, producing a lazily evaluated > > semi-finite list. It is further proposed that operations on > > such lists also be carried out lazily. > > > Why only the right operand? What's wrong with @a[..1]? > > Of course then > @negodds = grep { $_%2 } (..-1); > needs to start at the top and work down, but that seems OK... Possible. I'll add it in as a speculation and let Larry veto it :-) Damian
- RFC 24 (v1) Semi-finite (lazy) lists Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 24 (v1) Semi-finite (lazy) lists Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 24 (v1) Semi-finite (lazy) lists Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 24 (v1) Semi-finite (lazy) lists Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 24 (v1) Semi-finite (lazy) lists Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC 24 (v1) Semi-finite (lazy) lists Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 24 (v1) Semi-finite (lazy) lists Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 24 (v1) Semi-finite (lazy) lists Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 24 (v1) Semi-finite (lazy) lists Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 24 (v1) Semi-finite (lazy) lists Mike Pastore
- Re: RFC 24 (v1) Semi-finite (lazy) lists Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 24 (v1) Semi-finite (lazy) lists Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 24 (v1) Semi-finite (lazy) lists Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 24 (v1) Semi-finite (lazy) lists Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 24 (v1) Semi-finite (lazy) li... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 24 (v1) Semi-finite (laz... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 24 (v1) Semi-finite ... Ariel Scolnicov