@a = @b || @c should 'work'. In P5 it puts @b in scalar context and thus evaluates as the number of elements in @b if there are any. This one is so tiny, I feel like it should be grouped with something else before it's big enough for an RFC... what do people think? Is it part of a larger issue I haven't seen? -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies
- Re: @a = @b || @c Peter Scott
- Re: @a = @b || @c Johan Vromans
- Re: @a = @b || @c Peter Scott