Re: Different higher-order func notation? (was Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions)

[Ken Fox]

[Sorry, spent too much time thinking in the editor and did not
 see this before my reply.]

Mike Pastore wrote:
> - ^foo is the placeholder 'foo'

That already has perfectly good meaning: XOR with the function foo().

> Although, I suppose '&' would not work.

Why not? I think it would work great.

- Ken