John Porter writes: > But I admit this could be regarded as an edge case. Yeah, you could easily make this part of the module's interface. Removing the eval-to-true requirement would be one less arbitrary thing for people writing modules to do, and I'm very in favour of that. Nat
- RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requirement for fina Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requirement f... John Porter
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requireme... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requi... John Porter
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove r... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Rem... John Porter
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation:... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requi... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requi... Andy Wardley
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requirement f... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requireme... John Porter
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requirement f... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requireme... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requi... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove r... iain truskett
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Rem... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Rem... Bart Lateur