From: Peter Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>At 12:07 AM 8/8/00 +0200, Bart Lateur wrote:
>>On Mon, 07 Aug 2000 10:56:40 -0700, Peter Scott wrote:
>>Check the docs again. [snip]
>> Four special subroutines act as package constructors and
>> destructors. These are the `BEGIN', `CHECK', `INIT', and `END'
>> routines. The `sub' is optional for these routines.
>Drat. I propose making it non-optional for P6. ETOOMANYSPECIALCASES. Any
>objections?
Yeah, I have to object on the basis that it seems Perlish (and perlish, as
far and I get that) to me for me to be able to skip a word here and there
where what's happening (ie, I'm creating a set of instructions, or
subrutine.)
-Corwin
