On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> If you feel the need, it should be possible to let you do this, or at
> least a part of it for one or three ops, with a module. I think it might
> be better to wait until the plain way's in and then embellish it later.

I do believe (and please, folks, correct me if I'm wrong) that's Larry's
intent with this whole project is to make Perl6 a fundamentally
object-oriented language. At least, that's what I've been able to gather
from the discussion threads in this mailing list.

Which is the reason I suggest Perl++ as a name for the language, instead
of Perl6. :)

--
Mike Pastore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to