Peter Scott writes:
> I have often wondered whether a language could allow user-defined 
> operators.  The fact that none have done it should be a clue :-)  I guess 
> it's getting too incestuous with the lexer.

Ilya sent in a patch for user-defined operators.  It was rejected,
not least because your new operators had to look like

  ``+++''

skanky quotes and all.  This was probably to avoid too much lexercest.

Nat

Reply via email to