On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 02:09:43AM +0200, Bart Lateur wrote: > On Thu, 10 Aug 2000 14:39:39 -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: Did not. > > people in Newfoundland are going to expect to be > >> able to pass in -0230 and have that work, and that's interestingly hard. > > What's so hard? Subtracting 2 hours and 30 minutes from the official > referential time (GMT)? Or the Daylight Savings Time rules? Without any further thought I'll just shoot and say the DST rules because they are legislation and fickle, not logic/astronomy and stable. > -- > Bart. -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace localtime() a... John Tobey
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace localtime... Russ Allbery
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace local... John Tobey
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Russ Allbery
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Bart Lateur
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Russ Allbery
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Bart Lateur
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Russ Allbery
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Peter Scott
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Russ Allbery
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace localtime() and gmtime... Matt Sergeant
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace localtime() and g... John Porter
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace localtime() a... Uri Guttman
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace localtime() and g... Jonathan Scott Duff