> On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 10:34:00AM -0400, John Porter wrote: > > I support the idea of renaming the block eval as die, and leaving eval Crimonentlies! I meant "try", of course. :-/ Freudian slip? -- John Porter
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and cl... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and classes fo... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and classe... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and cl... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects an... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and cl... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects an... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects an... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objec... John Porter
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception o... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception o... John Porter
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception o... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception o... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and classes fo... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and classes for bui... Tony Olekshy