Damian Conway wrote: > > The proposed C<key> and C<value> built-ins (or the extended C<keys> and > C<values>) would be used on a pair reference: > > print key $array[0]; # or perhaps: print keys $array[0]; > print value $array[0]; # or perhaps: print value $array[0]; What's the point? Sounds like a pair is just hash-of-one. -- John Porter
- RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) with =&... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma... Mike Pastore
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma... Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma... Brad Hughes
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying c... Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying c... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying c... John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying c... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (string... Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (s... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying c... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying c... Mark Cogan