This is an errata ro RFC89(V2). I'll resubmit the RFC sometime this week.  The 
corrections, each enclosed by a pair of "***" are for phrases under the following 
headings. I had ignored the casting effects of int on $id2 and $id3. And varchar(16)?

=head2 Constraint lists
...........
$id2 and $id3 are similar declarations such that a cast not found in the constraint 
list
will be spontaneously added to the constraint list; Both acquires
***(varchar, double, int)***
value of
***2***;


=head2 Suitability and precedence in constraint lists
.............
$ie6 has as candidates varchar and char(16), but since varchar is declared in
precedence to char(16), the receiver is a varchar. The inclusion of 
***char(16)****
is in vain as varchar completely over-rides it.



HERE IS THE EXTRACT OF THE ORIGINAL

=head2 Constraint lists
...........
$id2 and $id3 are similar declarations such that a cast not found in the constraint 
list
will be spontaneously added to the constraint list; Both acquires (varchar, double)
value of 2.6;


=head2 Suitability and precedence in constraint lists
............
$ie6 has as candidates varchar and char(16), but since varchar is declared in
precedence to char(16), the receiver is a varchar. The inclusion of varchar(16)
is in vain as varchar completely over-rides it.

Reply via email to