Ed Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >I've noted a few messages here with statements like "it looks like C++" and >"I hated that in Pascal" and so on. If we restricted ourselves to constructs >not found in other languages, there would be no Perl as we know it today. >Larry freely admits he borrowed constructs and techniques from many >languages. > >There are many logical reasons for and against the RFC's here, but saying >"it looks like c so it doesn't make it for me" is a weak argument at best. I don't think anyone made that argument - they have all been "I hate that in ..." type comments. I did not work for X, so probably won't for for us - _is_ a valid argument. We borrow what works not what doesn't! > -- Nick Ing-Simmons
- Does Perl need true constants? (was R... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 83 (v1) Make constants look like ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 83 (v1) Make constants look l... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 83 (v1) Make constants look like vari... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 83 (v1) Make constants look like ... Steve Simmons
- Re: RFC 83 (v1) Make constants look l... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 83 (v1) Make constants look like variables Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 83 (v1) Make constants look like variables James Mastros
- Re: RFC 83 (v1) Make constants look like variables Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 83 (v1) Make constants look like variables Ed Mills
- Re: RFC 83 (v1) Make constants look like variable... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 83 (v1) Make constants look like vari... John Porter
- Re: RFC 83 (v1) Make constants look like ... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 83 (v1) Make constants look like variable... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 83 (v1) Make constants look like vari... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 83 (v1) Make constants look like ... Jeremy Howard