Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking

[John Porter]

iVAN Georgiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 
> They behave similarly like &&, ||, and, or operator with one main
> distinction they "backtrack" for example:
> 
> { block1 } B<andthen> { block2 };

This would be a good use of the to-be-liberated => operator:

  { block1 } => { block2 };

In any case, "andthen" doesn't seem like a good choice. 
Other possibilities:
        therefore
        implies
        segue
        seq
        so

-- 
John Porter