Or "popup" (as in, fly ball", and then "field". Of course, if we had "raise", then we could have "sustain" and "overrule". -- John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Dan Sugalski
- Re: English language basis for "throw" John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Nathan Torkington
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Peter Scott
- Re: English language basis for "throw" John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Stephen P. Potter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Tony Olekshy
- Re: English language basis for "throw" John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Peter Scott
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Glenn Linderman
- Re: English language basis for "throw" John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" skud
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Piers Cawley
- Re: English language basis for "throw" David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versioning And Searching Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versioning And Searching Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versioning And Searching Bennett Todd
- RFC 78 and shared vs unshared modules/data Steve Simmons