Re: subroutines ==? methods

[Damian Conway]

   > The difference is one of use, not one of meaning. Why not extend
   > "method" to be any subroutine, just as we have apparently extended
   > "subroutine" to include "function" by not acknowledging any
   > distinction there either?

In fact, Class::Multimethods *doesn't* distinguish methods and subroutines.
Neither will my forthcoming multiple dispatch RFC.

Damian