Re: Make lvalue subs the default (was Re: RFC 107 (v1) lvalue subs should receive the rvalue as an argument)

[Andy Wardley]

On Aug 16,  8:32am, Nathan Wiger wrote:
> Maybe this is the confusion. I'm not saying subs should ONLY be lvalue.
> I think they should be both rvalue and lvalue at the same time.

Point noted and understood, but I'm with the general consensus here.
Lvalue subs should have to be explicitly marked as such.  This could,
of course, be done automatically for you by a C<use lvalue> pragma, or
something similar, but it shouldn't be the default case.


A




-- 
Andy Wardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   Signature regenerating.  Please remain seated.
     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   For a good time: http://www.kfs.org/~abw/