Damian Conway wrote: > So C<with> is going to have to do some pretty freaky magic to work out > it should call that sub as part of the C<print>. And call it with a > specifically ordered argument list. Yes, I never said it would work, just that it looked nicer :) > However, your suggestion *did* spark an excellent idea for me to do, > with named placeholders and named subroutine parameters. Many thanks! We're still not even. I got quite a few ideas from your book. Clayton -- Clayton Scott
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default filehandle... Damian Conway
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default fileh... Clayton Scott
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default fileh... Robert Mathews
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default fileh... Damian Conway