Damian Conway wrote:

> So C<with> is going to have to do some pretty freaky magic to work out
> it should call that sub as part of the C<print>. And call it with a
> specifically ordered argument list.

        Yes, I never said it would work, just that it looked nicer  :)
 
> However, your suggestion *did* spark an excellent idea for me to do,
> with named placeholders and named subroutine parameters. Many thanks!

        We're still not even. I got quite a few ideas from your book.

Clayton
-- 
Clayton Scott

Reply via email to