Ted Ashton wrote:
>
> > all
> > dereferencing can be done with ->.
>
> Is that "can be done with" or "must be done with"?
>
> Either way, I like the idea. To me it reads more smoothly, and as I seldom
> dare to use the double-punctuation form ($$ and so on) and use instead the
> ${$} form, it would be an equal number of characters and fewer curlies (which,
> I think, is a win).
Can be done with. @{ foo() || bar() } seems preferable to, say,
[scalar(foo() || bar())]->[0]->@. :-)
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ri... Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ge... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ge... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let'... Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise -... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise -... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise -... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise -... Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise -... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise -... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise -... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise -... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise -... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise -... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise -... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ri... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ge... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% John Porter
