> I've always wished it was the famous "do what I mean" operator:
>
> if ($a eq "input") {
> ... # let perl figure out what to do here
> } else {
> print "I need more input!\n";
> }
>
> That'd make "rapid application development" truly possible.
> Maybe we can code it up with "Quantum::Superpositions::any"?
Easy. I'll just add a C<thing> operator to Q::S. It would take no
arguments and return a (lazy?) list of every possible Perl subroutine.
use Quantum::Superpositions '@thing';
if ($a eq "input") {
(any thing)->(@_);
}
else {
print "I need more input!\n";
}
Damian
PS: Can you tell whether I'm joking?
- Do we really need eq? Ed Mills
- Re: Do we really need eq? Nathan Torkington
- Re: Do we really need eq? Spider Boardman
- Re: Do we really need eq? Randal L. Schwartz
- ... as a term Larry Wall
- Re: ... as a term Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: ... as a term Nathan Torkington
- Re: ... as a term skud
- Re: ... as a term Damian Conway
- Re: ... as a term John Porter
- Re: ... as a term Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: ... as a term Damian Conway
- Re: ... as a term Larry Wall
- Re: ... as a term Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: ... as a term John Porter
- Re: ... as a term Larry Wall
- Re: ... as a term John Porter
- Re: ... as a term Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: ... as a term John Porter
