>Today around 11:48am, Tom Christiansen hammered out this masterpiece:
>: >So basically, it would be nice if each, keys, values, etc. could all deal
>: >with being handed a hash from a code block or subroutine...
>:
>: In the current Perl World, a function can only return as output to
>: its caller a LIST, not a HASH nor an ARRAY. Likewise, it can only
>: receive a LIST, not those other two.
>So, this is really a bug?
>#!/usr/local/bin/perl -w
>use strict;
>$|++;
>sub func {
> return qw/KeyOne Value1 KeyTwo Value2/;
>}
>print "$_\n" foreach keys &func();
No. keys() expects something that starts with a %, not
something that starts with a &.
--tom
- functions that deal with hash should be more liberal Jerrad Pierce
- Re: functions that deal with hash should be more ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: functions that deal with hash should be m... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: functions that deal with hash should ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: functions that deal with hash sho... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: functions that deal with has... Tom Christiansen
- Re: functions that deal with... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: functions that deal with has... Nathan Torkington
- Re: functions that deal with... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: functions that deal with has... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: functions that deal with hash should ... John Porter
- Re: functions that deal with hash sho... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: functions that deal with hash should be more ... Jerrad Pierce
- Re: functions that deal with hash should be m... Tom Christiansen
