On Mon, 28 Aug 2000 08:46:25 -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote: >> OTOH, what about this... >> >> print <<EOL >> blah >> EOL; >> >> which makes this a full blown statement (note the missing semicolon in >> the first line)... > >No it doesn't! > >perl -e ' > print <<EOF > Hello world! >EOF; >' >Can't find string terminator "EOF" anywhere before EOF at -e line 2. Gee, you already have a working copy of this hypothetical perl6 interpreter? Neat! Of course it doesn't work now. But if you insist on allowing, say, another statement on the same line as the end-of-doc marker, than at least allow the statement terminating semicolon, too. -- Bart.
- RFC 111 (v2) Here Docs Terminators (Was Whitespace and... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 111 (v2) Here Docs Terminators (Was White... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 111 (v2) Here Docs Terminators (Was W... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 111 (v2) Here Docs Terminators (Was White... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 111 (v2) Here Docs Terminators (Was White... Eric Roode
- Re: RFC 111 (v2) Here Docs Terminators (Was W... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 111 (v2) Here Docs Terminators (W... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 111 (v2) Here Docs Terminator... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 111 (v2) Here Docs Terminator... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 111 (v2) Here Docs Terminators (W... Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 111 (v2) Here Docs Terminator... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 111 (v2) Here Docs Terminators (Was W... Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 111 (v2) Here Docs Terminators (W... David L. Nicol