>Well, as I mentioned in another recent parallel thread, if C<for> is to >be properly functionalized, Whoa -- why? Syntax keywords (eg if, unless) certainly need not be expressible as functions. This isn't tcl! --tom
- RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions should be functions Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions should be fun... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions should be... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions should be fun... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions should be... John Porter
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions shoul... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions s... John Porter
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functi... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions shoul... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions should be... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions should be... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions shoul... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions s... John Porter
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions s... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functi... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in fu... Piers Cawley