At 02:49 PM 8/29/00 -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, David L. Nicol wrote:
>
> > I'd like to see every number bundled with a "precision" attribute.
>
>While that might be useful for simple calculations, I expect it would
>simply get in the way and slow things down for larger, more complex
>calculations.
It'd also tend to freak people out when this:
my $foo : sig_figs(1) = 2;
print 3.1415926 * $foo;
printed out 6. You think we have bug reports from floating point issues now...
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Re: ... as a term John Porter
- Re: ... as a term Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: ... as a term John Porter
- Re: Do we really need eq? Steve Simmons
- Re: Do we really need eq? John Porter
- Re: Do we really need eq? David L. Nicol
- Re: Do we really need eq? Peter Scott
- Re: Do we really need eq? Tom Christiansen
- Re: Do we really need eq? Andy Dougherty
- attributes definable as well as value... David L. Nicol
- RE: Do we really need eq? Dan Sugalski
- RE: Do we really need eq? Lipscomb, Al
- Re: Do we really need eq? Nathan Wiger
- RE: Do we really need eq? Fisher Mark
- Re: Do we really need eq? David L. Nicol
- Re: Do we really need eq? Dan Sugalski
