Graham Barr wrote:
> Also it hash been
> suggested that it could potentially replace each
> 
>   for my($k,$v) (%hash) { ... }

Continuing my crusade for beefier prototypes, I can easily envision this:

        for(\$\$\%&);

callable as

        for ($k,$v) %h { }

-- 
John Porter

        We're building the house of the future together.

Reply via email to