Graham Barr wrote: > Also it hash been > suggested that it could potentially replace each > > for my($k,$v) (%hash) { ... } Continuing my crusade for beefier prototypes, I can easily envision this: for(\$\$\%&); callable as for ($k,$v) %h { } -- John Porter We're building the house of the future together.
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was ... Bart Lateur
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was Re: Multiple for loop... John Porter
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was Re: Multiple for loop... Damian Conway
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was Re: Multiple for ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was Re: Multiple for ... Damian Conway
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was Re: Multiple ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was Re: Multiple ... Damian Conway
- Re: Multiple for loop variables Eric Roode
- Re: Multiple for loop variables Graham Barr
- Re: Multiple for loop variables John Porter
- Re: Multiple for loop variables Steve Simmons
- Re: Multiple for loop variables Peter Scott
- Re: Multiple for loop variables David L. Nicol
- Re: Multiple for loop variables Eric Roode
- Re: Multiple for loop variables Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Multiple for loop variables Jeremy Howard