Graham Barr wrote:
> Also it hash been
> suggested that it could potentially replace each
>
> for my($k,$v) (%hash) { ... }
Continuing my crusade for beefier prototypes, I can easily envision this:
for(\$\$\%&);
callable as
for ($k,$v) %h { }
--
John Porter
We're building the house of the future together.
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was ... Bart Lateur
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was Re: Multiple for loop... John Porter
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was Re: Multiple for loop... Damian Conway
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was Re: Multiple for ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was Re: Multiple for ... Damian Conway
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was Re: Multiple ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was Re: Multiple ... Damian Conway
- Re: Multiple for loop variables Eric Roode
- Re: Multiple for loop variables Graham Barr
- Re: Multiple for loop variables John Porter
- Re: Multiple for loop variables Steve Simmons
- Re: Multiple for loop variables Peter Scott
- Re: Multiple for loop variables David L. Nicol
- Re: Multiple for loop variables Eric Roode
- Re: Multiple for loop variables Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Multiple for loop variables Jeremy Howard
