At 10:19 AM 8/30/00 -0400, Jerrad Pierce wrote:
>Not a huge issue, but I hadn't seen anyone else bring it up.
>If in fact:
>         bareword filehandles are ditched
>         globs are killed
>         prototypes are potentially touched.
>
>perlsub
>            sub myopen (*;$)         myopen HANDLE, $name
>            sub mypipe (**)          mypipe READHANDLE, WRITEHANDLE
>
>You have things to consider:
>         you make prototyping even more of a five-pound weakling, and provide
>         no filehandle prototyping

And?  We have no reference prototyping either.

>         you preserve the current syntax, using what will in the future
>         be an obscure syntax since globs are gone. (fun perl trivia)
>
>         concoct a new magical incantation to represent filehandles

I was pretty much assuming that any detritus surrounding bareword 
filehandles would exit along with them.

No-one AFAICT has yet brought up formats, and what would happen to them if 
bareword filehandles go the way of the dodo.  I am hoping that they get put 
into a module anyway, but can someone who uses them more than I do opine on 
how the declaration syntax ought to change if there are no bareword 
filehandles?
--
Peter Scott
Pacific Systems Design Technologies

Reply via email to