At 04:36 PM 8/30/00 -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote: > >the reason that they're duplicatable with other features, while I want > >to drop chop because its main purpose has now been replaced with the > >far superior chomp. > >Except that chomp() relies upon the ueberglobal $/ variable, >irrespective of the source of the data being chomped. I presume that line disciplines will be object-oriented and inherit from some base class; therefore a bare chomp will use the line terminator from that base class and for the others, you could do something like $fh->chomp($line) to do chomping specific to a particular filehandle. Make sense? -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies
- RE: Proposal: chop() dropped Al
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Tom Christiansen
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Nathan Wiger
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Tom Christiansen
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Nathan Torkington
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Bart Lateur
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped skud
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Ed Mills
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Nathan Torkington
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Tom Christiansen
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Peter Scott
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Tom Christiansen
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Jonathan Scott Duff
- RE: Proposal: chop() dropped Eric Roode
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Eric Roode
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Nathan Torkington
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Dan Zetterstrom
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Dan Zetterstrom
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Buddha Buck
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Jonathan Scott Duff
