Garrett Goebel wrote:
>
> * Subroutines automatically get their name as a label
My concern here is whether it introduces a problem with C<goto foo>
vs. C<goto &foo>. If, as you propose, subs do get their name as label,
I would like to conflate these two forms. But the semantics of
C<goto &foo> specifies that @_ is passed as is to the sub entrance.
I suppose it would be o.k. to define C<goto foo> identically; just not
sure. Any thoughts?
--
John Porter
We're building the house of the future together.
