On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 06:04:41PM -0400, Mark-Jason Dominus wrote: > > > seconded by Mark-Jason Dominus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Except that I don't think adding this feature to the existing q{...} > is a good idea. If I had to vote on your proposal, I would instantaly > vote against it. I think you should have invented a new operator or a > pragma or something. Agreed. One could for example have a pragma to *really* tag variables lexically to be expanded within singlequotes. Or for that matter, *not* to be expanded within doublequotes. -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
- RFC 226 (v1) Selective interpolation in single quotish... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 226 (v1) Selective interpolation in singl... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 226 (v1) Selective interpolation in s... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 226 (v1) Selective interpolation ... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 226 (v1) Selective interpolat... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 226 (v1) Selective inter... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 226 (v1) Selective inter... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 226 (v1) Selective i... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 226 (v1) Selective i... Brad Hughes
- Re: RFC 226 (v1) Selective i... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 226 (v1) Selective i... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 226 (v1) Selective interpolation in singl... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 226 (v1) Selective interpolation in s... Brad Hughes