Re: RFC 255 (v2) Fix iteration of nested hashes

[Damian Conway]

   > >This RFC proposes that the internal cursor iterated by the C<each>
   > >function be stored in the pad of the block containing the C<each>,
   > >rather than being stored within the hash being iterated.
   > 
   > Then how do you specify which iterator is to be reset when you wish 
   > to do that? Currently, you do this by specifying the hash.
   
   > If the iterator is no longer affiliated with the hash, but the opcode node,

Just to note: in version 2 of the RFC, it's associated with the pad of
the block in which the C<each> appears.


   > then what are you going to do?  

The short answer is that there is no "manual" reset of iterators.

Damian