On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, iain truskett wrote: > Or someone could split CGI.pm up so that there's CGI::FormValues and > CGI::HTTPHeaders. By jove Mr. Truskett, that sounds like a smashing idea! Could we RFC this? Do you think Mr. Stien would think us pushy? IMHO this thread is discussing the implementation of a module, lets have an RFC that frames it that way. Alan Gutierrez
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support iain truskett
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support iain truskett
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support iain truskett
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Supp... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI ... iain truskett
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class ... Alan Gutierrez
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class ... iain truskett
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Supp... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI ... iain truskett
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class ... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Hildo Biersma
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Alan Gutierrez
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Supp... Nathan Wiger