>
> Very little discussion was generated by this RFC. Several people noted that perl -de
>42 and the Perl shell psh already provide some
> of what the RFC requests; this is noted in the RFC.
>
> The RFC is not being withdrawn, since 2 other people expressed (mild) interest in
>it.
I'd like to add that multiline shell capabilities would be *extremly*
useful for the perldl shell (as already noted by the author) and
pdl-porters emphatically support this RFC.
If Python can do it Perl6 should be able to do it as well. In the very
least multi-line sub definitions. Anything less would be disappointing.
Christian
