Greg Williams wrote:
> as I remember, the C<no scope;> pragma, when used, would simply act as if the
>enclosing scope were not in place, enabling such things as:
> if ($ints) {
> no scope;
> use integer;
> }
Hmm. C<no scope> could be implemented in terms of the rfc 340 C<with> like
so:
$scope_out_here = with;
if ($ints) {
with $scope_out_here {use integer}
};
C<caller> is about subroutine calls.
--
David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"After jotting these points down, we felt better."
- RFC 339 (v1) caller->eval BLOCK Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 339 (v1) caller->eval BLOCK Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 339 (v1) caller->eval BLOCK Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 339 (v1) caller->eval BLOCK Greg Williams
- Re: RFC 339 (v1) caller->eval BLOCK David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 339 (v1) caller->eval BLOCK Greg Williams
- Re: RFC 339 (v1) caller->eval BLOC... David L. Nicol
