On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 11:13:27AM -0400, John Porter wrote: > Simon Cozens wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 04:53:00PM -0400, John Porter wrote: > > > May I point out that "the camel was designed by committee"*, too? > > > > The camel was certainly not, > > I presume you haven't ever heard the famous epigram to which I alluded? I have, I was just doubting its veracity. > I hate to have to disagree with you on this, Simon, ;-), > but when I agree with you -- which is often -- there's usually > not much I can add, so I don't. You go, boy! Argh. You just *had* to agree then, didn't you, just to be awkward? :) -- A Law of Computer Programming: Make it possible for programmers to write in English and you will find that programmers cannot write in English.
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for documentatio... Nicholas Clark
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for document... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for docu... Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for documentatio... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for document... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for document... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for document... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for docu... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for ... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for ... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for documentation ins... Adam Turoff