James Mastros wrote: > (And please, don't get into epoch discussions here. The units, accuracy, > resolution, and zeropoint of a measurement are all different questions. I > personaly would prefer to see units of seconds, a basepoint of 1/1/1970, and > resolution and accuracy best-reasonably-available.) The issue of B<accuracy> is I<completely> outside perl's bailiwick. -- John Porter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Branden
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Damian Conway
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? abigail
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? David L. Nicol
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Nathan Wiger
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? abigail
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? James Mastros
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? John Porter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Bart Lateur
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Branden
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Bart Lateur
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Nicholas Clark
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Branden
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Simon Cozens
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Branden
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Andy Dougherty