Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM?

[Simon Cozens]

On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 09:00:47AM -0500, John Porter wrote:
> > Uhm. NO! Remembering that $x+1 things have changed is an "added burden"
> > over remembering that $x things have changed.
> 
> Not as x approaches infinity.

We are not changing an infinite number of things.

> Please knock it off with the "Keep Perl Perl" non-argument.

No.

-- 
[It is] best to confuse only one issue at a time.
                -- K&R