On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 01:09:11PM -0500, John Porter wrote: > > >"It isn't possible to AUTOLOAD DESTROY." --perlmem(6) > > I'm not sure what that means. Certainly AUTOLOAD gets > called if DESTROY is called but not defined ... just > like any other method. Yes, its a classic autoloader mistake to accidentally handle DESTROY calls.
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Jan Dubois
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Robin Berjon
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Robin Berjon
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) James Mastros
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Nicholas Clark
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) John Porter
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) James Mastros
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Peter Scott
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Nicholas Clark
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) David Mitchell
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Branden
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) James Mastros
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) John Porter
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) James Mastros