On 17 Feb 2001 20:53:51 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: >Could >people please take the advocacy traffic elsewhere where it isn't noise? Advocacy is noise everywhere. That doesn't mean that davocates for either side don't have anything interesting to say. For starters, it's usually dissatisfaction with certain aspects of some languages that causes the birth of yet another new language, such as PHP (which is more a different programming platform than really a different, full blown language) and Ruby. When designing a new generation of a language, it can be interesting to look what those alternative language designers have done. They just might have done some interesting things. No language is an island. -- Bart.
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and... Simon Cozens
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and defa... John Porter
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and defa... Russ Allbery
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and defa... yaphet jones
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and defa... David Grove
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and defa... David Grove
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and defa... David Grove
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and defa... David Grove
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and defa... yaphet jones
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and defa... Bart Lateur
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and... Peter Scott
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and defa... Russ Allbery