On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 12:59:54PM -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote:
> > Doesn't ~ look like a piece of string to you? :-)
> It looks like a bitwise op to me, personally.
That's because every time you've used it in Perl, it's been a bitwise
op. Sapir-Whorf, and all that.
--
So what if I have a fertile brain? Fertilizer happens.
-- Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Larry Wall
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Edward Peschko
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Larry Wall
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Peter Scott
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloadin... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Bart Lateur
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Bart Lateur
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Larry Wall
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Eric Roode
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Simon Cozens
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Bart Lateur
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloadin... Larry Wall
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloadin... David L. Nicol
