At 04:20 AM 6/30/01 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 01:47:39AM -0600, Dan Brian wrote: > > > Everyone's making these assumptions, WHY WON'T ANYONE LOOK AT > > > CLASS::OBJECT?! > > > > It might not work, Schwern. And even if it did, it might be really slow. > > Somebody should write an implementation first, and then tackle efficiency. > >This is a joke, right? I'm on Candid Camera. I think people are just surprised that you didn't call it Red::Herring. -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies http://www.perldebugged.com
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? Nathan Torkington
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? schwern
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? schwern
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? Michael Fowler
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? John Porter
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? Michael G Schwern
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? Dan Brian
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? schwern
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? schwern
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? David L. Nicol
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? schwern
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? Uri Guttman
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? David L. Nicol
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? Adam Turoff
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? David L. Nicol