On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 03:37:41PM -0500, David L. Nicol wrote:
> Uri Guttman wrote:
>
> > one related point is that this symbol table will be accessible via
> > caller() so you could access/install lexical symbols in a parent block
> > on the call stack. scary!
> >
> > uri
>
> We must demand that the feature come with a way to seal the current
> context from manipulation, even possibly a way to block accesses.
Doesn't sound very Perlish to me.
--
Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pjcj.net
