Bart Lateur wrote:
> So, in this case, a "with" synonym for "for" would work.
>
> But this only works for scalars. You can't have a %foo alias to
> %Some::Other::hash this way, or a @bar alias to @Some::Other::array.
Sounds like what we really want is a form of "for" which can iterate
over a list of hashes or arrays:
for my @a ( @foo, @bar ) { ...
for my %h ( %foo, %bar ) { ...
--
John Porter
- Re: aliasing - was:[nice2haveit] Bart Lateur
- Re: aliasing - was:[nice2haveit] jh_lists
- Re: aliasing - was:[nice2haveit] Stuart Rocks
- Re: aliasing - was:[nice2haveit] Stuart Rocks
- RE: aliasing - was:[nice2haveit] Sterin, Ilya
- Re: aliasing - was:[nice2haveit] Stuart Rocks
- RE: aliasing - was:[nice2haveit] Sterin, Ilya
- Re: aliasing - was:[nice2haveit] John Porter
- RE: aliasing - was:[nice2haveit] Sterin, Ilya
- Re: aliasing - was:[nice2haveit] John Porter
- Re: aliasing - was:[nice2haveit] Me
- Please sign me off Alice Li
