> > Aaron Sherman wrote
> Larry's hubris notwithstanding, I'd like to suggest that
> "more", in this
> case means "no, it prints nothing".
>
> This *must* be true, as you don't want:
>
> @a ^+ @b
>
> to always return an infinite list. You want it to produce a list with
> (as a3 suggested) length max(@a.length,@b.length)
OK, now we've got this resolved, I'd like to return the focus
back to the original point.
@x ^= 0;
@x[5]++;
does not have problems with NaNs; and does not generate a warning
with -w.
My suggestion was to extend this to work with hashes, too.
something like
%x ^= $^_ => 0;
or
values %x ^= 0;
Dave.
